Manipulated and Suppressed: The Alberta Report (Part Three)
Examining Government Overreach, Data Suppression, and Ethical Failures in Pandemic Management
In this third installment of our three-part interview, Dr. Gary Davidson continues to discuss the process and findings of the Alberta COVID-19 Pandemic Data Review Task Force Report. Despite lacking subpoena power, the report uncovers critical errors in Alberta’s COVID-19 response, highlighting failures in governance, transparency, and decision-making. Hopefully this is just the beginning of a larger investigation.
You can find the great work done by Dr. Gary Davidson and his team in the Alberta COVID-19 Pandemic Data Review Task Force Report.
Be part of the change by demanding that our governments halt the use of the COVID-19 injections:
You can find and support Eric Bouchard at:
X (Formally Twitter): @EricBouchardAB
Ted Kuntz is part of Vaccine Choice Canada: Take advantage of the resources and events at Vaccine Choice Canada and help support the important VCC mission:
You can find and support Dr. Mark Trozzi at:
Substack: Dr Mark Trozzi
X (Formally Twitter): @DrTrozzi
Global Psychological Operations and the Manipulation of Public Perception
The global response to COVID-19 appeared to be a deliberate psychological operation that weaponized fear and coercion. The systematic manipulation of doctors, nurses, teachers, and politicians ensured the continuation of policies that ignored real-world evidence and suppressed dissenting voices. Many professionals, despite witnessing alarming patterns of adverse reactions, were unable or unwilling to challenge the prevailing narrative. The sheer force of psychological conditioning prevented many from accepting they had been deceived, even as evidence of increased blood clots, miscarriages, and other severe health issues mounted.
The Role of Bureaucracy in Suppressing Critical Data
The Alberta Report further evidences that government decisions were not made by elected officials but by entrenched bureaucracies and health authorities with little to no accountability. Data on natural immunity was ignored, and vital health records were withheld from those seeking to analyze the real impact of COVID-19 policies.
For instance, when researchers requested mortality and vaccination data from Alberta's health system, they were met with stonewalling. Officials refused to disclose whether elderly individuals classified as "unvaccinated" had actually received one or more doses before succumbing to the virus. The refusal to release such critical data suggests an intentional effort to obscure reality rather than a simple bureaucratic failure.
"Vaccine" Safety and the Manufactured Illusion of Scientific Consensus
From the outset, alternative treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were aggressively discredited, while "vaccination" was presented as the only viable option. Yet, the data from Pfizer’s own clinical trials should have raised immediate red flags. These studies lacked proper long-term oversight, omitted key demographics (such as pregnant women and elderly individuals), and prematurely eliminated control groups, making any meaningful long-term safety assessment impossible.
Subsequent real-world studies have only confirmed the dangers of these experimental injections. A recent Yale study demonstrated that individuals who received "vaccinations" after prior COVID-19 infection suffered severe immune system damage. Similarly, the Cleveland Clinic found a disturbing correlation between increased "vaccination" doses and higher all-cause mortality.
Misleading Definitions and Deceptive Reporting
A striking revelation is how data manipulation contributed to false narratives. Individuals were considered "unvaccinated" until two weeks after their second dose—meaning any adverse reaction occurring before this timeframe was attributed to the "unvaccinated" population. This misclassification skewed statistics and reinforced the coercive push for mass "vaccination."
Additionally, public messaging was riddled with contradictions. While the public was told that natural immunity was insufficient, health authorities were not even able to differentiate between naturally immune individuals and those who had received injections.
The Ethical Collapse of Medical Institutions
One of the most profound failures of the COVID-19 response was the abandonment of medical ethics. Doctors who questioned the safety and efficacy of "vaccination" were censored, stripped of their licenses, and vilified. Meanwhile, those who followed orders without question were rewarded, despite the mounting evidence of harm. The medical establishment continually failed in its duty to prioritize patient welfare over political agendas.
Furthermore, the willingness to sacrifice vulnerable populations—whether by denying early treatment options, isolating elderly individuals, or pressuring parents to inject their children with experimental gene therapies—exposed a deep moral failure within modern medicine.
The Need for Accountability and Justice
While forgiveness and understanding are necessary, accountability cannot be overlooked. Those responsible for the suppression of data, coercion of medical professionals, and enforcement of harmful policies must face legal consequences. The massive profits reaped by pharmaceutical companies, fueled by deception and coercion, must not go unaddressed.
Rebuilding After a Cultural and Moral Crisis
At its core, the COVID-19 response was not just a failure of public health policy but a test of culture. The ease with which entire populations were coerced into compliance reveals a deep societal vulnerability. Fear was weaponized to justify medical tyranny, and very few had the courage to resist. The solution to this is not merely political reform but a return to stable moral foundations.
Strong families, ethical education, and a commitment to truth must be the basis of future resistance against mass psychological operations. Individuals and communities need to cultivate the strength to stand by their principles, even when faced with difficult consequences.
The Path Forward
The failures of the COVID-19 response must serve as a lesson for future generations. Society cannot afford to ignore the dangers of unchecked government power, corporate profiteering, and psychological manipulation. The path forward requires truth, justice, and moral courage. Only by acknowledging these failures and committing to fundamental moral principles can we hope to prevent similar abuses in the future.
Thank you guys, the value of this report is priceless, and may save lives.
From another Substack article linked here:
https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/the-price-of-cowardice?
"Dr. Gary Davidson had a Covid Data Review report ready by the middle of 2023.
Nothing was released until late January 2025!
For comparison, a nationwide volunteer inquiry, that collected testimony from across the country on a donation budget, was able to release an interim report on Sept 14, 2023.
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/commissioners-interim-report/
The evidence of harms from government policies, banning ivermectin and coercion to take the mRNA injections was conclusive by the beginning of 2023."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMHO, after reading this article, people should still do further research of their own and not just believe Dr. GD.... I truly appreciate all that Dr. Trozzi and VCC do to bring information to us, but I am not buying what Dr. GD is selling.