A Call for Transparency: The Alberta Report (Part One)
Investigating Alberta's COVID-19 Response and the Need for Greater Accountability
In this first installment of our three-part interview, Dr. Gary Davidson and Eric Bouchard discuss the process and findings of the Alberta COVID-19 Pandemic Data Review Task Force Report. Despite lacking subpoena power, the report uncovers critical errors in Alberta’s COVID-19 response, highlighting failures in governance, transparency, and decision-making. Hopefully this is just the beginning of a larger investigation.
You can find the great work done by Dr. Gary Davidson and his team in the Alberta COVID-19 Pandemic Data Review Task Force Report.
Be part of the change by demanding that our governments halt the use of the COVID-19 injections:
You can find and support Eric Bouchard at:
X (Formally Twitter): @EricBouchardAB
Ted Kuntz is part of Vaccine Choice Canada: Take advantage of the resources and events at Vaccine Choice Canada and help support the important VCC mission:
You can find and support Dr. Mark Trozzi at:
Substack:
X (Formally Twitter): @DrTrozzi
A Critical Inquiry into Alberta’s COVID-19 Response
The release of the Alberta Report on the response to the COVID-19 has sparked significant discussion regarding the province’s handling of the crisis. Spearheaded by a task force assembled by Premier Danielle Smith and led by Dr. Gary Davidson, the report seeks to provide a comprehensive review of the decisions made, the information relied upon, and the overall governance that dictated Alberta’s COVID response. This investigation aims not only to evaluate past actions but also to ensure that future public health responses are based on transparency, scientific integrity, and ethical governance.
The Formation and Purpose of the Task Force
The Alberta government initiated this review with the goal of understanding how decisions were made during the COVID-19 response and assessing the impact of public health measures. Eric Bouchard, a key political figure in Alberta, played an instrumental role in ensuring that this review was conducted by individuals committed to scientific integrity and public accountability. The task force was composed of a diverse group of medical professionals, epidemiologists, and legal experts. However, many individuals and organizations declined to participate, raising questions about accountability within Alberta Health Services (AHS).
Lack of Transparency and the Suppression of Alternative Views
One of the key findings of the report highlights a significant lack of transparency in the flow of information within Alberta’s health governance structure. Alberta Health Services operated as an arm’s-length entity from the government, making it difficult to assess the justification behind many of its decisions. Moreover, many of the leading voices behind the province’s public health measures were unwilling to provide documentation or engage with the task force, further fueling concerns about a lack of accountability.
Throughout the COVID response alternative medical perspectives were systematically suppressed. Physicians who questioned the prevailing narrative, including those advocating for early treatment protocols, faced professional repercussions. The regulatory bodies overseeing healthcare professionals ensured strict adherence to government-endorsed policies, often at the expense of open scientific debate.
Regulatory Bodies and the Suppression of Medical Dissent
The role of regulatory bodies, particularly the College of Physicians and Surgeons, was another major focal point of the report. These organizations, which were expected to uphold medical ethics and scientific debate, instead acted as enforcers of public health mandates. Physicians who sought to offer alternative treatments or question the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 "vaccine" faced suspension, censorship, and loss of licensure.
Dr. Davidson emphasized that these regulatory actions were not solely dictated by provincial authorities but were heavily influenced by federal and international bodies such as the FDA and WHO. These organizations set the precedent for what was deemed “acceptable” medical practice, leaving little room for dissenting voices. The result was a medical climate where doctors were coerced into compliance under threat of severe professional consequences.
Governance and the Role of International Directives
The report examines how Alberta’s policies were shaped by international directives rather than independent provincial assessments. This raises questions about why Alberta did not employ its existing pandemic response plan, which had been developed based on decades of research into managing respiratory virus outbreaks. Instead, the province followed a centralized, one-size-fits-all approach dictated by global health organizations. The chosen approach failed to take into account the economic, psychological, and social consequences of prolonged lockdowns and school closures.
The Ethical Dilemma Faced by Physicians
The report also sheds light on the ethical challenges that many medical professionals faced during the COVID-19 response. Dr. Davidson shared his personal experience of having to choose between adhering to institutional mandates or upholding his medical oath to prioritize patient care. His decision to prioritize ethical medical treatment over regulatory compliance cost him professionally but reaffirmed his commitment to medical integrity.
Many physicians found themselves in similar positions, recognizing that public health directives were not always rooted in sound scientific evidence. The coercion to comply with mandates, including the administration of the COVID-19 "vaccine," despite emerging safety concerns, placed doctors in a difficult position where they had to choose between their careers and their conscience.
Calls for a Full Inquiry and Future Recommendations
While the Alberta Report provides a thorough review of available data, Dr. Davidson and his team emphasize that their work was limited in scope. The inability to compel testimony or access critical internal documents hindered the investigation’s depth. As a result, one of the key recommendations of the report is the need for a full judicial inquiry, equipped with subpoena power, to uncover the full extent of decision-making failures.
The report’s recommendations include
Increased transparency in health governance.
The restoration of independent medical decision-making for physicians.
A review of regulatory body practices to ensure they support, rather than suppress, scientific debate.
An end to the reliance on international health directives that override locally developed pandemic response plans.
The Path to Rebuilding Trust
The Alberta Report on the COVID-19 response serves as a crucial first step toward understanding what went wrong and how to prevent similar failures in the future. The findings indicate that a lack of transparency, overreliance on global health organizations, and suppression of medical dissent contributed to flawed public health policies.
As Premier Danielle Smith and the Alberta government review these findings, there is a growing demand for greater accountability and reform. The report’s call for a full judicial inquiry is essential to ensure that past mistakes are acknowledged, those responsible are held accountable, and future public health responses prioritize transparency, ethical medical practices, and the well-being of all Albertans.
If there is not a full review and implementation of Doctors and citizens rights brought back with leaving the totalitarian WHO, UN and organizations like the Fascist WEF! There will be no trust at all in governments also defunding all Media and total transparency brought into where all our tax money goes!!!!!!!
Thank you to all involved in the report and discussion today. Someone should check on the cattle, they have not moved an inch.